An attack on one is an attack on everyone. Article 5 NATO will die if fragmented – Observer

In order to be our subscriber, you have free access to all articles in the audience.

Kaliningrad. It covers an area of ​​15 thousand square kilometers of Russian territory, but it is far from Russia. Land that was once German and is about the size of Northern Ireland is surrounded by Poland, Lithuania and the Baltic Sea. This part of Vladimir Putin’s country is very real, but it can add a little confidence. Pretend that Russian President Kaliningrad wants to build a causeway connecting Moscow. An algorithm gives the answer we want: It is a 16-hour journey (approximately 1,300 kilometers) across Latvia and Lithuania. An alternative is to cross the long-distance ally Belarus and pinch off part of Poland. In these two fictional scenes of the Kremlin advancing within NATO countries, The Atlantic Alliance’s response should be the same: an attack on a NATO member is considered an attack on everyone. Article 5 North Atlantic Treaty. But will it be?

It is easy to believe that the change in the US presidency, with Biden’s election, increased security and NATO’s return to use the goal of “one for all” in contrast to what happened in the Trump administration.

During the previous US administration, uncertainty was high. Trump Said with all the letters, In 2016, in an interview with The New York Times: The United States should not automatically defend an ally in the event of an attack. If the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania-Russia are attacked, Trump will assess whether those countries have “fulfilled their obligations.”, Before giving them military assistance. Obligations are financial: The purpose of each member is to set aside 2% of its GDP for defense spending. Interestingly, the 2021 data indicate that these three countries are part of a group of eight NATO members. The cost exceeded Awake.

The same US President even said that NATO was outdated – Then, in 2017, he said he was no more – and the French president considered an alliance in 2019 The brain is dead. Emmanuel Macron’s words criticizing Turkey’s unilateral behavior in Syria upset then – German Chancellor Angela Merkel and showed the division between the countries that signed the North Atlantic Treaty.

Pub Continue reading below

A few days before an important NATO summit, Turkish President Macron responded the same week: “Investigate your own brain death first”, disse Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

The United States will only protect us if NATO nations fulfill their obligations to us: Trump

The divisions over Syria have not been resolved in NATO, and in recent days they have returned to the topic of conversation. But with the election of Joe Biden, the school of thought in Washington changed and the United States returned to defend NATO’s importance in the world order. It was like boiling water, though without lasting benefit.

“I am one of those who understands that if Donald Trump had been re-elected, we would have begun to discuss the true survival of the Atlantic Alliance.” Professor Louis tells Tom Observer.

“From this point of view, those who are invited in 2018 – like Ukraine and Georgia – will not be presented,” he argues, and for Putin it will be a lesser argument, because there will be no debate. Until the 1990s there was the possibility of expanding NATO to other countries as part of Soviet influence. “Perhaps we have begun to discuss the existence of the Atlantic Alliance.” Underscores the Director of the Department of International Relations at the University Autonomous de Lispova.

See also  France says Europe must prepare to end Russian energy exports - Observer

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.